Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50420 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTURO OCHOA-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-269-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Artur
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50420 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTURO OCHOA-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-269-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Arturo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-50420
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARTURO OCHOA-RUIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-269-ALL
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Arturo Ochoa-Ruiz (Ochoa) has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ochoa has not
filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.