Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10001 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRENCE S. COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-123 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent T
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10001 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRENCE S. COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-123 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Te..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-10001
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERRENCE S. COLEMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:05-CR-123
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Terrence S. Coleman has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Coleman has not
filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.