Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Coleman, 06-10001 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-10001 Visitors: 57
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10001 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRENCE S. COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-123 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent T
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 14, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 06-10001
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRENCE S. COLEMAN,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 3:05-CR-123
                      --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Terrence S. Coleman has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Coleman has not

filed a response to counsel’s motion.    Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues

for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer