Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Dow, 06-20369 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-20369 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20369 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN EUGENE DOW, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-423-2 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Kevin E
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    February 14, 2007

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 06-20369
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEVIN EUGENE DOW,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 4:05-CR-423-2
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Kevin Eugene Dow has filed a

motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Dow has not filed a response.    Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue.     Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer