Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40022 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GUADALUPE LERMA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-558-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to repr
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40022 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE GUADALUPE LERMA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-558-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to repre..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-40022
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE GUADALUPE LERMA-GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-558-ALL
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe Lerma-Garcia
(Lerma) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lerma
has filed a motion requesting the appointment of substitute
counsel. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Lerma’s
response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-40022
-2-
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The motion by
Lerma for substitution of counsel is DENIED. See United States
v. Wagner,
158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).