Filed: Mar. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In The United States Court Of Appeals March 21, 2007 For The Fifth Circuit Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41328 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. LEONEL FLORES-HUERTA, Defendant–Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas No. 5:05-CR-399 Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* On December 11, 2006, the Supreme Court vacated our judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In The United States Court Of Appeals March 21, 2007 For The Fifth Circuit Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41328 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. LEONEL FLORES-HUERTA, Defendant–Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas No. 5:05-CR-399 Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* On December 11, 2006, the Supreme Court vacated our judgm..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
In The United States Court Of Appeals March 21, 2007
For The Fifth Circuit
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41328
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
LEONEL FLORES-HUERTA,
Defendant–Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
No. 5:05-CR-399
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
On December 11, 2006, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment in this case and
remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549
U.S. ___ (2006). Upon reconsideration, we AFFIRM the defendant’s conviction, but we
VACATE the defendant’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing in light of Lopez.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.