Filed: Apr. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10587 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP LINTON MOBLEY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-75-ALL - Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10587 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP LINTON MOBLEY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-75-ALL - Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 3, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-10587
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PHILLIP LINTON MOBLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:05-CR-75-ALL
--------------------
Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel appointed to
represent Phillip Linton Mobley has moved for leave to withdraw
and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mobley was notified of counsel’s motion,
but he has not filed a response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-10587
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.