Froemling v. Boxer Property Mgmt, 06-20760 (2007)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 06-20760
Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 27, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _ No. 06-20760 Summary Calendar _ ALEXIS FROEMLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BOXER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:05-CV-1536-EW) _ Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alexis Froemling appeals the district
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 27, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _ No. 06-20760 Summary Calendar _ ALEXIS FROEMLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BOXER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:05-CV-1536-EW) _ Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alexis Froemling appeals the district ..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 27, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _______________________ No. 06-20760 Summary Calendar _______________________ ALEXIS FROEMLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BOXER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:05-CV-1536-EW) __________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Alexis Froemling appeals the district court’s summary judgment that she take nothing in her lawsuit brought under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 Having reviewed the record de novo, we affirm for the reasons given in the district court’s thorough memorandum and order. AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
