Filed: Apr. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20637 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. CARL BENNETT ACQUAYE Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-60-ALL - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Carl Bennett Acquaye
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20637 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. CARL BENNETT ACQUAYE Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-60-ALL - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Carl Bennett Acquaye h..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 25, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-20637
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
CARL BENNETT ACQUAYE
Defendant - Appellant
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-60-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed for Carl Bennett Acquaye has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.