Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Acquaye, 04-20637 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-20637 Visitors: 43
Filed: Apr. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20637 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. CARL BENNETT ACQUAYE Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-60-ALL - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Carl Bennett Acquaye
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 25, 2007

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                             No. 04-20637
                           Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                       Plaintiff - Appellee

     v.

CARL BENNETT ACQUAYE

                       Defendant - Appellant

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:04-CR-60-ALL
                       --------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed for Carl Bennett Acquaye has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer