Filed: Apr. 10, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 10, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-11386 Clerk Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAMON PEREZ, also known as Rufegio Perez Mireles, also known as Pedro, also known as Jesse, also known as Gregorio Berrun, also known as Alfredo Cantu, also known as Raquel Pena, also known as Gesus Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United Stat
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 10, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-11386 Clerk Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAMON PEREZ, also known as Rufegio Perez Mireles, also known as Pedro, also known as Jesse, also known as Gregorio Berrun, also known as Alfredo Cantu, also known as Raquel Pena, also known as Gesus Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United State..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 10, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-11386 Clerk
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAMON PEREZ, also known as Rufegio Perez Mireles, also known as
Pedro, also known as Jesse, also known as Gregorio Berrun, also
known as Alfredo Cantu, also known as Raquel Pena, also known as
Gesus Garcia,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:04-CR-178-ALL
--------------------
Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Perez
has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perez has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.