Filed: Apr. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-31081 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEITH PARKER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CR-89-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-31081 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEITH PARKER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CR-89-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent K..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-31081
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KEITH PARKER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:05-CR-89-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Keith Parker in this appeal
from a pre-trial detention order has requested leave to withdraw
from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Parker has filed a response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and
Parker’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities in connection with this
appeal, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.