Morris v. Trans Union LLC, 06-20181 (2007)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 06-20181
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 10, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 10, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20181 Clerk KENNETH M. MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TRANS UNION, LLC. Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas - Houston Division Case No. 4:04-CV-577 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully considered t
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 10, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20181 Clerk KENNETH M. MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TRANS UNION, LLC. Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas - Houston Division Case No. 4:04-CV-577 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully considered th..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 10, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20181 Clerk KENNETH M. MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TRANS UNION, LLC. Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas - Houston Division Case No. 4:04-CV-577 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no clear error of fact or error of law and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
