Filed: May 02, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20268 Clerk Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMANDO ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CR-99-ALL - Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Armando Jimen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20268 Clerk Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMANDO ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CR-99-ALL - Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Armando Jimene..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 2, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 06-20268 Clerk
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARMANDO ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ-FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
No. 4:04-CR-99-ALL
--------------------
Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Armando Jimenez-Flores has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with An-
ders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jimenez-Flores has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the rec-
ord discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.