Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jimenez-Flores, 06-20268 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-20268 Visitors: 27
Filed: May 02, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-20268 Clerk Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMANDO ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CR-99-ALL - Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Armando Jimen
More
                                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                       Fifth Circuit
                                                                    F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                         May 2, 2007

                                                                Charles R. Fulbruge III
                               No. 06-20268                             Clerk
                             Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMANDO ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ-FLORES,
                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                         No. 4:04-CR-99-ALL
                        --------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Armando Jimenez-Flores has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with An-

ders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).           Jimenez-Flores has not

filed a response.    Our independent review of the brief and the rec-

ord discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.           Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.               See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer