Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bruce v. Perrill, 97-1118 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 97-1118 Visitors: 54
Filed: Dec. 05, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk DANIEL R. BRUCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM PERRILL, Warden, FCI- Englewood, Federal Bureau of No. 97-1118 Prisons; ANGELA SHENK, Inmate (D.C. No. 96-S-1441) Records Mgr; HARRY SINGLE- (Colorado) TARY, Secretary, Florida Dept. of Corrections; D. DUFER; DON HUNTER; TRANSCOR AMERICA INC., a Tennessee Corporation, Extradition Agent, Defendants-Appellees. ORDER AND
More
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk DANIEL R. BRUCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM PERRILL, Warden, FCI- Englewood, Federal Bureau of No. 97-1118 Prisons; ANGELA SHENK, Inmate (D.C. No. 96-S-1441) Records Mgr; HARRY SINGLE- (Colorado) TARY, Secretary, Florida Dept. of Corrections; D. DUFER; DON HUNTER; TRANSCOR AMERICA INC., a Tennessee Corporation, Extradition Agent, Defendants-Appellees. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Daniel R. Bruce appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record, the relevant authorities, and plaintiff’s arguments on appeal, and we are persuaded that the district court did not err in dismissing the case. We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court substantially for the reasons stated in the court’s Order of Dismissal. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer