Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Garcia-Ramirez, 06-41212 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-41212 Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41212 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGELINO GARCIA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-346-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 18, 2007

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 06-41212
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANGELINO GARCIA-RAMIREZ,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 1:03-CR-346-ALL
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angelino

Garcia-Ramirez (Garcia) has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Garcia has not filed a response.     Our independent review

of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer