Filed: Apr. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41212 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGELINO GARCIA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-346-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41212 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGELINO GARCIA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-346-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-41212
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANGELINO GARCIA-RAMIREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:03-CR-346-ALL
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angelino
Garcia-Ramirez (Garcia) has requested leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Garcia has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.