Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Burke, 06-50580 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-50580 Visitors: 60
Filed: Apr. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-50580 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LONNIE ALBERT BURKE, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-28-SS-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 18, 2007

                                                             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk
                              No. 06-50580
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LONNIE ALBERT BURKE, JR.,

                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. 1:99-CR-28-SS-ALL
                          --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Lonnie Albert Burke,

Jr., has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).      Burke has not filed a

response.    Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.     Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer