United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   May 24, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 05-41345
                           Summary Calendar


DAVID AGUIRRE,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PAUL DYER, JR., Corrections Officer; QUINTON GUILBEAU,
Corrections Officer; AMANDA PARKER, Corrections Officer,

                                      Defendants-Appellees.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 1:02-CV-5
                       --------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     David Aguirre, Texas prisoner # 899858, appeals the summary

judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies.    Finding no error we affirm.

     We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying

the same standard as the district court.      Mississippi River Basin

Alliance v. Westphal, 

, 174 (5th Cir. 2000).         A

prisoner who wishes to file a § 1983 suit for damages against

prison officials must exhaust administrative remedies before


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                             No. 05-41345
                                  -2-

doing so.    42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Johnson v. Johnson, 

, 515 (5th Cir. 2004).    The Texas Department of Justice -

Correctional Institutions Division provides a two-step process

for filing grievances.     

.   A prisoner

must pursue a grievance through both steps to satisfy the

exhaustion requirement.     

filed a Step 1

grievance, he conceded that he did not file a proper Step 2

grievance.   Thus, he did not exhaust his remedies.

     Aguirre’s contention that he was not required to file a Step

2 grievance because his Step 1 grievance was referred to the

Internal Affairs Division is without merit.      See Crain v.

Prasifka, 

, 870 (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).     Aguirre’s

ignorance of the rules requiring a Step 2 grievance does not

excuse his noncompliance.     See Fisher v. Johnson, 

,

714 (5th Cir. 1999).

     Because we conclude that the magistrate judge did not err in

concluding that Aguirre failed to exhaust his administrative

remedies, we need not consider Aguirre’s claims regarding verbal

abuse and threats.     See Ballard v. Burton, 

, 401-02

(5th Cir. 2006) (this court may affirm summary judgment on any

grounds supported by the record).

     For the foregoing reasons, the judgment dismissing Aguirre’s

complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is

AFFIRMED.