Filed: May 10, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 10, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-50539 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus ANTOINE EARL POWELL, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-1 - Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antoine Earl Powell appeals his sentence follo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 10, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-50539 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- Appellee, versus ANTOINE EARL POWELL, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-1 - Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antoine Earl Powell appeals his sentence follow..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
May 10, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-50539
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-
Appellee,
versus
ANTOINE EARL POWELL,
Defendant-
Appellant.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:05-CR-219-1
--------------------------------------------------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Antoine Earl Powell appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to aiding and abetting the
possession with intent to distribute at least 50 grams of crack cocaine and aiding and abetting the
possession of a firearm during the commission of a drug-trafficking crime. He argues that his 151-
month and consecutive 60-month sentence was unreasonable and unjust for an offense of this type,
character, and seriousness.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Because Powell’s sentence was within a properly calculated guideline range of 151 to 188
months, we infer that the district court considered all the factors for a fair sentence set forth in the
Guidelines. See United States v. Mares,
402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
126 S. Ct. 43
(2005). “[A] sentence within a properly calculated Guideline range is presumptively reasonable.”
United States v. Alonzo,
435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Powell has failed to demonstrate that
his properly calculated guidelines sentence was unreasonable. See id.;
Mares, 402 F.3d at 519.
AFFIRMED.
-2-