Filed: Jun. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-40141 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TITO ALBERTO CISNEROS, also known as Tito Alberto Lemos, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-529-ALL - Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* App
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-40141 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TITO ALBERTO CISNEROS, also known as Tito Alberto Lemos, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-529-ALL - Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appe..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 6, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 07-40141
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TITO ALBERTO CISNEROS, also known as Tito Alberto Lemos,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:06-CR-529-ALL
--------------------
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Tito Alberto
Cisneros raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-
Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held
that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a
separate criminal offense. The appellant’s motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.