Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Vega-Malaga, 06-41345 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-41345 Visitors: 41
Filed: Jun. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41345 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL VEGA-MALAGA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-380-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 20, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 06-41345
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL VEGA-MALAGA,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 1:04-CR-380-ALL
                      --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel

Vega-Malaga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Vega-Malaga has not filed a response.    Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer