United States v. Walker, 06-60683 (2007)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 06-60683
Visitors: 39
Filed: Jun. 12, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit June 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-60683 Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee VERSUS TONTE DEON WALKER Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi, Gulfport 1:05-CR-94-LG Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the partie
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit June 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-60683 Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee VERSUS TONTE DEON WALKER Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi, Gulfport 1:05-CR-94-LG Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit June 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-60683 Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee VERSUS TONTE DEON WALKER Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi, Gulfport 1:05-CR-94-LG Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district court did not err in finding that the Mayor of Biloxi declared a curfew that was in effect at the time the officers stopped the defendant on the streets of Biloxi. For that reason,the district court did not err in denying Walker’s motion to suppress. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is affirmed. AFFIRMED. 1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
