Filed: Jul. 11, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51416 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-MEJIA, also known as Oscar Rodriguez-Mejia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-520-ALL - Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* A
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51416 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-MEJIA, also known as Oscar Rodriguez-Mejia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-520-ALL - Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ap..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 11, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-51416
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EVARISTO RODRIGUEZ-MEJIA, also known as Oscar
Rodriguez-Mejia,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:06-CR-520-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Evaristo
Rodriguez-Mejia raises arguments that are foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),
which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and
not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for
summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.