Filed: Aug. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20432 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MINH VAN PHAM Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-412-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Minh Van Pham
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20432 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MINH VAN PHAM Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-412-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Minh Van Pham h..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
August 21, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-20432
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MINH VAN PHAM
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-412-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Minh Van Pham has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pham has filed a response. Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Pham’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.