Filed: Aug. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41072 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO CAMACHO-BARAJAS, also known as Alfonso Alvarez-Garcia Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-749-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41072 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO CAMACHO-BARAJAS, also known as Alfonso Alvarez-Garcia Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-749-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* T..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
August 21, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-41072
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FRANCISCO CAMACHO-BARAJAS, also known as Alfonso
Alvarez-Garcia
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:05-CR-749-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Camacho-
Barajas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Camacho-Barajas has filed a
response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this
time of Camacho-Barajas’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United
States v. Cantwell,
470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-41072
of the record, counsel’s brief, and Camacho-Barajas’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2