Filed: Aug. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 8, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41479 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICARDO ESPINOZA-MEDRANO, also known as Ricardo Montalvo-Medrano Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-140-ALL Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appeal
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 8, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41479 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICARDO ESPINOZA-MEDRANO, also known as Ricardo Montalvo-Medrano Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-140-ALL Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appeali..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
August 8, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-41479
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RICARDO ESPINOZA-MEDRANO, also known as Ricardo
Montalvo-Medrano
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:06-CR-140-ALL
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ricardo Espinoza-Medrano
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523
U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision
and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.