Filed: Aug. 15, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D August 15, 2007 No. 06-60438 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Petitioner - Cross-Respondent v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Local Union No. 657 Respondent - Cross-Petitioner Petition for Review & Cross-Petition for Enforcement from an Order of the National Labor Relations Board No. 16-CB-6348 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and GARZA, Circuit Judg
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D August 15, 2007 No. 06-60438 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Petitioner - Cross-Respondent v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Local Union No. 657 Respondent - Cross-Petitioner Petition for Review & Cross-Petition for Enforcement from an Order of the National Labor Relations Board No. 16-CB-6348 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and GARZA, Circuit Judge..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 15, 2007
No. 06-60438
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Petitioner - Cross-Respondent
v.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Local Union No. 657
Respondent - Cross-Petitioner
Petition for Review & Cross-Petition for Enforcement from an Order
of the National Labor Relations Board
No. 16-CB-6348
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We review the remedial orders of back pay by the National Labor
Relations Board to ensure that the Board was not arbitrary in its selection of a
formula used to calculate back pay, NLRB v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc.,
358
F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir. 1966), and that the Board’s award of back pay was not
punitive, Florida Steel Corp. v. NLRB,
587 F.2d 735, 746 (5th Cir. 1979). In this
case, there is no evidence to support a claim that the Board was either arbitrary
or punitive. Based on the deferential standard of review we give to the Board’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-60438
order of back pay, its order shall be ENFORCED. Respondent’s cross-petition
for review is DENIED.
2