Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Contreras-Martinez, 07-10216 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-10216 Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 8, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-10216 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO CONTRERAS-MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-51-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fr
More
                                                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                       Fifth Circuit
                                                                    F I L E D
         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                            August 8, 2007
                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                        Clerk
                               No. 07-10216
                            Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO CONTRERAS-MARTINEZ

                                         Defendant-Appellant


                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 6:06-CR-51-1


Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Contreras-
Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a
penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion
for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.



     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer