Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Salazar, 07-10260 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-10260 Visitors: 48
Filed: Aug. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-10260 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. NATHANIEL JEREMY SALAZAR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-27-8 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Nathan
More
                                                                     United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit
                                                                           F I L E D
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                              August 21, 2007
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                                Clerk
                                  No. 07-10260
                               Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

NATHANIEL JEREMY SALAZAR

                                              Defendant-Appellant


                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 6:06-CR-27-8


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
      The attorney appointed to represent Nathaniel Jeremy Salazar has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Salazar has filed a response. Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Salazar’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


      *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer