Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Serrano-Rosales, 07-50045 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-50045 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 8, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-50045 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. EFREN SERRANO-ROSALES, also known as Juan Zepeda Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1492-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment i
More
                                                                United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit
                                                                      F I L E D
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                             August 8, 2007
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                  Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                          Clerk
                                No. 07-50045
                             Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EFREN SERRANO-ROSALES, also known as Juan Zepeda

                                           Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Texas
                          USDC No. 3:06-CR-1492-1


Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Efren Serrano-Rosales raises
arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and
not a separate criminal offense.     The Government's motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer