Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Santoyo-Garcia, 06-40662 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-40662 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 17, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D No. 06-40662 September 17, 2007 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FRANCISCO SANTOYO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 2:05-CR-758-1 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repr
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                                              Fifth Circuit
                                                                            F I L E D
                                     No. 06-40662                         September 17, 2007
                                   Summary Calendar
                                                                        Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                                Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FRANCISCO SANTOYO-GARCIA,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.



                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                                No. 2:05-CR-758-1




Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*


       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Santoyo-
Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with


       *
          Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 06-40662

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Santoyo-Garcia has not filed a re-
sponse. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to with-
draw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer