Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Domingo-Godinez, 07-10404 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-10404 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 07-10404 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAFAEL DOMINGO-GODINEZ, also known as Jeremias Lopez-Perez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-94-ALL Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judg
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                     FILED
                                                                   October 3, 2007
                                  No. 07-10404
                               Conference Calendar              Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                        Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                             Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAFAEL DOMINGO-GODINEZ, also known as Jeremias Lopez-Perez

                                             Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 5:06-CR-94-ALL


Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rafael Domingo-Godinez
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision
and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 
492 F.3d 624
, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The




      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                               No. 07-10280

Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer