Filed: Oct. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 07-10404 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAFAEL DOMINGO-GODINEZ, also known as Jeremias Lopez-Perez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-94-ALL Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judg
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2007 No. 07-10404 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAFAEL DOMINGO-GODINEZ, also known as Jeremias Lopez-Perez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-94-ALL Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgm..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 3, 2007
No. 07-10404
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RAFAEL DOMINGO-GODINEZ, also known as Jeremias Lopez-Perez
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:06-CR-94-ALL
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rafael Domingo-Godinez
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523
U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision
and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,
492 F.3d
624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-10280
Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2