Filed: Sep. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D No. 07-30130 September 18, 2007 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARY LOUISE SPENCER BENSON; SHANTA MAGNOLIA SPENCER; CALVIN LEWIS BENSON; MARJORIE LAJUANA BENSON; CARDELL BENSON, JR.; CARL LEE THOMAS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DETENTION CENTER UNION PARISH; COREGIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Di
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D No. 07-30130 September 18, 2007 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARY LOUISE SPENCER BENSON; SHANTA MAGNOLIA SPENCER; CALVIN LEWIS BENSON; MARJORIE LAJUANA BENSON; CARDELL BENSON, JR.; CARL LEE THOMAS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DETENTION CENTER UNION PARISH; COREGIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
No. 07-30130 September 18, 2007
Summary Calendar
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
MARY LOUISE SPENCER BENSON;
SHANTA MAGNOLIA SPENCER; CALVIN LEWIS BENSON;
MARJORIE LAJUANA BENSON; CARDELL BENSON, JR.;
CARL LEE THOMAS,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DETENTION CENTER UNION PARISH;
COREGIS INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
No. 3:06-CV-1519
No. 07-30130
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
In their brief on appeal, appellants present no real legal argument ex-
pressing or explaining their position as to how, in their view, the district court
committed reversible error. This failure adequately to brief any of the stated is-
sues on appeal constitutes waiver of those issues. See FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A);
United States v. Beaumont,
972 F.2d 553, 563 (5th Cir. 1992) (“Failure of an ap-
pellant to properly argue or present issues in an appellate brief renders those is-
sues abandoned.”). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecu-
tion.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
2