Bonds v. Alliance Bank, 07-40272 (2007)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 07-40272
Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 02, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 2, 2007 No. 07-40272 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk CLARENCE BONDS Plaintiff - Appellant v. ALLIANCE BANK; TOM SELLER; BREIT PRICE; SAM HALL; KENNETH HALL; PAULA SHIROMA BENDER Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman USDC 4:06-CV-207 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 2, 2007 No. 07-40272 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk CLARENCE BONDS Plaintiff - Appellant v. ALLIANCE BANK; TOM SELLER; BREIT PRICE; SAM HALL; KENNETH HALL; PAULA SHIROMA BENDER Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman USDC 4:06-CV-207 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 2, 2007 No. 07-40272 Charles R. Fulbruge III Summary Calendar Clerk CLARENCE BONDS Plaintiff - Appellant v. ALLIANCE BANK; TOM SELLER; BREIT PRICE; SAM HALL; KENNETH HALL; PAULA SHIROMA BENDER Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman USDC 4:06-CV-207 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court has read Clarence Bonds’ complaints against the six defendants and the voluminous papers filed in the record, and we have to conclude that he has not raised any claim under the federal law. The magistrate judge in his report on February 7 explains the reasons for this. Judge Schneider considered * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-40272 the claims and concurred with the magistrate judge. Federal law for the reasons already stated allows no jurisdiction or provision for any claim Bonds has made. The judgment is AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
