Filed: Oct. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 05-41012 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDWIN CHARLES FORTES, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-86-ALL Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repres
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 05-41012 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDWIN CHARLES FORTES, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-86-ALL Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represe..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2007
No. 05-41012
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EDWIN CHARLES FORTES, JR
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-86-ALL
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edwin Charles
Fortes, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Fortes has filed a response. The
record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Fortes’s
claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell,
470
F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-41012
brief, and Fortes’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2