Filed: Oct. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 06-10245 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. KIM JOE GRAVES, also known as K-Rock, also known as Kim Joe Graves, Jr Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-82-4 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Th
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 06-10245 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. KIM JOE GRAVES, also known as K-Rock, also known as Kim Joe Graves, Jr Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-82-4 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2007
No. 06-10245 Charles R. Fulbruge III
Conference Calendar Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
KIM JOE GRAVES, also known as K-Rock, also known as Kim Joe Graves, Jr
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:05-CR-82-4
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Kim Joe Graves has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Graves has filed a response requesting that new counsel be
appointed. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Graves’s
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-10245
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
The request for new counsel is DENIED.
2