Filed: Oct. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 06-10337 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ASUNCION DOMINGO COBOS Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-264-17 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Asuncion Dom
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 06-10337 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ASUNCION DOMINGO COBOS Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-264-17 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Asuncion Domi..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2007
No. 06-10337
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ASUNCION DOMINGO COBOS
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:05-CR-264-17
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Asuncion Domingo Cobos has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cobos has filed a response. The record is
insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Cobos’s claims of
ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell,
470 F.3d 1087,
1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-10337
Cobos’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, Cobos’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2