Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez, 07-40106 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-40106 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2007 No. 07-40106 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAUL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-184-1 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed t
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                 FILED
                                                               October 25, 2007
                               No. 07-40106
                            Conference Calendar            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

RAUL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ

                                          Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 1:02-CR-184-1


Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Antonio
Hernandez-Hernandez (Hernandez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).
Hernandez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and Hernandez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer