Filed: Oct. 24, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2007 No. 07-50065 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERT L JONES Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:94-CR-260-1 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert L. Jones appeals the sentence imposed following rev
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2007 No. 07-50065 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERT L JONES Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:94-CR-260-1 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert L. Jones appeals the sentence imposed following revo..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 24, 2007
No. 07-50065
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ROBERT L JONES
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:94-CR-260-1
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert L. Jones appeals the sentence imposed following revocation of his
term of supervised release. Jones argues that his 36-month imprisonment
sentence is unreasonable because it is above the advisory guidelines range and
the sentencing factors cited by the district court can be satisfied with a shorter
sentence.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-50065
The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when
imposing Jones’ sentence. See United States v. Gonzalez,
250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th
Cir. 2001). The sentence is neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See
United States v. Hinson,
429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.
2