Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

88-4103 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 88-4103 Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 09, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 898 F.2d 1014 59 Ed. Law Rep. 618 Jake AYERS, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs, Jake Ayers, Jr., Bennie G. Thompson, Leola Blackmon, Lillie Blackmon, Louis Armstrong, Darryl C. Thomas and Leon Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant, v. William ALLAIN, Governor, State of Mississippi, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-4103. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 9, 1990. Robert Pressman, Alvin O. Chambliss, Jr., Center for Law and Educ., Cambridg
More

898 F.2d 1014

59 Ed. Law Rep. 618

Jake AYERS, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs,
Jake Ayers, Jr., Bennie G. Thompson, Leola Blackmon, Lillie
Blackmon, Louis Armstrong, Darryl C. Thomas and
Leon Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
William ALLAIN, Governor, State of Mississippi, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-4103.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 9, 1990.

Robert Pressman, Alvin O. Chambliss, Jr., Center for Law and Educ., Cambridge, Mass., for Ayers, et al.

Linda F. Thome, Jessica Dunsay Silver, Attys., Appellate Sec., Nathaniel Douglas, John R. Moore, Levern M. Younger, Franz R. Marshall, Zita Johnson-Betts, Attys., Opportunities Litigation Sec., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D.C., for U.S.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen., Paul Stephenson, William F. Goodman, Jr., Ed Davis Noble, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi; Neal B. Biggers, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion February 6, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 893 F.2d 732)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer