Filed: Feb. 12, 1993
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 90-8014 _ LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and JESSE OLIVER, ET AL., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, Etc., ET AL., Defendants, JIM MATTOX, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, versus JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ, Etc., JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD, Etc., and GEORGE S. BAYOUD, JR., Etc., Defendants-Appellants, and TOM RICKHOFF, SUSAN D. REED, JOHN J. SPECIA, JR., SID
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 90-8014 _ LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and JESSE OLIVER, ET AL., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, Etc., ET AL., Defendants, JIM MATTOX, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, versus JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ, Etc., JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD, Etc., and GEORGE S. BAYOUD, JR., Etc., Defendants-Appellants, and TOM RICKHOFF, SUSAN D. REED, JOHN J. SPECIA, JR., SID ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 90-8014 _____________________ LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and JESSE OLIVER, ET AL., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, Etc., ET AL., Defendants, JIM MATTOX, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants, versus JUDGE F. HAROLD ENTZ, Etc., JUDGE SHAROLYN WOOD, Etc., and GEORGE S. BAYOUD, JR., Etc., Defendants-Appellants, and TOM RICKHOFF, SUSAN D. REED, JOHN J. SPECIA, JR., SID L. HARLE, SHARON MACRAE and MICHAEL P. PEDAN, Bexar County, Texas State District Judges, Appellants. - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - (Opinion January 27, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, F.2 ) (February 11, 1993) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.* -2- (90-8014) BY THE COURT: A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *Judge Emilio M. Garza is recused, and, therefore, did not participate in this decision.
