Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Luevanos-Oviedo, 06-51574 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-51574 Visitors: 39
Filed: Nov. 08, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 8, 2007 No. 06-51574 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERTO LUEVANOS-OVIEDO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-560-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Robert
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                   FILED
                                                                 November 8, 2007
                                 No. 06-51574
                              Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                      Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERTO LUEVANOS-OVIEDO

                                            Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Texas
                         USDC No. 2:06-CR-560-ALL


Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto Luevanos-Oviedo
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty
provision and not a separate criminal offense.            See United States v.
Pineda-Arrellano, 
492 F.3d 624
, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.




      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                              No. 06-51574

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer