Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Rodriguez-Espinoza, 07-40685 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-40685 Visitors: 24
Filed: Dec. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-40685 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE SANTOS RODRIGUEZ-ESPINOZA, also known as Santos Joe Rodriguez-Espinoza Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-216-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                   FILED
                                                                 December 5, 2007
                                 No. 07-40685
                              Conference Calendar             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                      Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

JOSE SANTOS RODRIGUEZ-ESPINOZA, also known as Santos Joe
Rodriguez-Espinoza

                                            Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 7:07-CR-216-1


Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Santos Rodriguez-
Espinoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a
penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v.
Pineda-Arrellano, 
492 F.3d 624
, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.




      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                              No. 07-40685

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer