Filed: Jan. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 8, 2008 No. 06-11403 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FREDERICK WILLIAM STURM, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-16-5 Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Frederick William S
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 8, 2008 No. 06-11403 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FREDERICK WILLIAM STURM, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-16-5 Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Frederick William St..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 8, 2008
No. 06-11403
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FREDERICK WILLIAM STURM, JR
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:05-CR-16-5
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Frederick William Sturm, Jr. has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sturm has filed a response. The record is
insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Sturm’s conflict of
interest and ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See United States v.
Cantwell,
470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Sturm’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-11403
appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2