Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Zamora-Magdaleno, 07-10918 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-10918 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jan. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 30, 2008 No. 07-10918 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ZAMORA-MAGDALENO, also known as Roberto Madero-Sanchez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-10-1 Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                 FILED
                                                               January 30, 2008
                               No. 07-10918
                            Conference Calendar            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS ZAMORA-MAGDALENO, also known as Roberto Madero-Sanchez

                                          Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 1:07-CR-10-1


Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Zamora-Magdaleno
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty
provision and not a separate criminal offense.      United States v. Pineda-
Arrellano, 
492 F.3d 624
, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 
2008 WL 59441
(Jan.




      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                              No. 07-10918

7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                   2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer