Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gonzalez, 07-51135 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-51135 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jan. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 30, 2008 No. 07-51135 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. VICTOR H GONZALEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1065-ALL Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor H.
More
         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                                FILED
                                                              January 30, 2008
                               No. 07-51135
                            Conference Calendar           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VICTOR H GONZALEZ

                                         Defendant-Appellant


                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. 3:06-CR-1065-ALL


Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor H. Gonzalez raises
arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998). See United States v. Mata, 
491 F.3d 237
, 245 (5th Cir. 2007)
(holding that constitutional challenges to 21 U.S.C. § 851 are foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer