Filed: Feb. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 8, 2008 No. 06-20187 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SHERONDA JACKSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-411-4 Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Sheronda Jackson has mo
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 8, 2008 No. 06-20187 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SHERONDA JACKSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-411-4 Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Sheronda Jackson has mov..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 8, 2008
No. 06-20187
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SHERONDA JACKSON
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-411-4
Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Sheronda Jackson has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jackson has filed a response. The record is insufficiently
developed to allow consideration at this time of Jackson’s claims of ineffective
assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell,
470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th
Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jackson’s
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-20187
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2