Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jackson, 06-20187 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-20187 Visitors: 55
Filed: Feb. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 8, 2008 No. 06-20187 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SHERONDA JACKSON Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-411-4 Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Sheronda Jackson has mo
More
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                  FILED
                                                                February 8, 2008
                               No. 06-20187
                             Summary Calendar               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SHERONDA JACKSON

                                           Defendant-Appellant


                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Texas
                           USDC No. 4:04-CR-411-4


Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
      The attorney appointed to represent Sheronda Jackson has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Jackson has filed a response. The record is insufficiently
developed to allow consideration at this time of Jackson’s claims of ineffective
assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 
470 F.3d 1087
, 1091 (5th
Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jackson’s



      *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                                 No. 06-20187

response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer