Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Martinez, 07-40452 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-40452 Visitors: 27
Filed: Feb. 20, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 20, 2008 No. 07-40452 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CAMILO MARTINEZ, JR Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-583-1 Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Camilo
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         February 20, 2008
                                     No. 07-40452
                                  Conference Calendar                 Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                              Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CAMILO MARTINEZ, JR

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:06-CR-583-1


Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Camilo Martinez, Jr.,
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Martinez has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.      Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer