Filed: Apr. 16, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 16, 2008 No. 07-40504 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO HERNANDEZ, also known as Pedro Rangel Hernandez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-385-ALL Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public De
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 16, 2008 No. 07-40504 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO HERNANDEZ, also known as Pedro Rangel Hernandez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-385-ALL Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Def..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 16, 2008
No. 07-40504
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
PEDRO HERNANDEZ, also known as Pedro Rangel Hernandez
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:07-CR-385-ALL
Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Hernandez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez has filed a response. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hernandez’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-40504
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Hernandez’s
motion to appeal pro se is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner,
158 F.3d 901,
902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
2