Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hernandez, 07-40504 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 07-40504 Visitors: 98
Filed: Apr. 16, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 16, 2008 No. 07-40504 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. PEDRO HERNANDEZ, also known as Pedro Rangel Hernandez Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-385-ALL Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public De
More
         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                               FILED
                                                               April 16, 2008
                               No. 07-40504
                            Conference Calendar           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO HERNANDEZ, also known as Pedro Rangel Hernandez

                                         Defendant-Appellant


                Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 5:07-CR-385-ALL


Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Hernandez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Hernandez has filed a response.        Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hernandez’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities



     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                                No. 07-40504

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Hernandez’s
motion to appeal pro se is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 
158 F.3d 901
,
902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer