Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Santiago Gonzalez-Rojas, 11-40322 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 11-40322 Visitors: 56
Filed: Oct. 05, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-40322 Document: 00511622908 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2011 No. 11-40322 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SANTIAGO GONZALEZ-ROJAS, also known as Santiago Gonzalez-Riojas, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:10-CR-1082-1 Before GARZA, SOUT
More
     Case: 11-40322     Document: 00511622908         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/05/2011




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          October 5, 2011
                                     No. 11-40322
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SANTIAGO GONZALEZ-ROJAS, also known as Santiago Gonzalez-Riojas,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:10-CR-1082-1


Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The attorney appointed to represent Santiago Gonzalez-Rojas has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th
Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Rojas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

        *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer