Filed: Oct. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-40612 Document: 00511640071 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40612 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALBERTO CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:10-CR-878-1 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: Case: 11-40612 Document: 00511640071 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-40612 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALBERTO CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:10-CR-878-1 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
Case: 11-40612 Document: 00511640071 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 21, 2011
No. 11-40612
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ALBERTO CARDENAS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:10-CR-878-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Alberto Cardenas presents
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586
F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which reaffirmed that knowledge of drug type
and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The
appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.